Practical mining guide

Mining hashrate units: convert MH/s, GH/s, and TH/s

Convert hashes per second into common mining units and compare equipment without mixing algorithms, scales, or measurement windows.

Illustration: A miner beside three progressively larger cubes of orange hash particles.

Inside this guide

What you’ll learn

  1. Name the algorithm and the unit
  2. Step-by-step
  3. Worked example

Name the algorithm and the unit

Hashrate describes hash attempts per second. Common prefixes are mega, giga, and tera: MH/s, GH/s, and TH/s. One TH/s equals 1,000 GH/s or 1,000,000 MH/s when the underlying hashing operation is the same.

A numerical comparison across different mining algorithms is not a performance ranking. A SHA-256 terahash and a hash on another algorithm represent different work. Local dashboards and pool estimates can also use different averaging windows, so apparently conflicting measurements may describe different periods.

Step-by-step

  1. Copy the complete specification. Record algorithm, hashrate value, unit, operating mode, and the observation time together.
  2. Convert within one algorithm. Move every value to a single unit before adding miners or computing efficiency. Keep the original figures for traceability.
  3. Align the window. Compare stable measurements over the same duration. Use pool-side accepted-work estimates alongside device readings rather than replacing one with the other.

Worked example

Illustrative example. Two hypothetical SHA-256 workers report 100 TH/s and 50,000 GH/s. Converting the second to 50 TH/s gives a combined nominal 150 TH/s, before uptime or rejected work.

The combined number is a capacity estimate, not a promise that the pool will credit that exact rate continuously. Record a second figure for observed accepted work.

Common mistakes

  • Adding MH/s to TH/s without converting.
  • Ranking unrelated algorithms by the largest displayed number.
  • Comparing a one-minute device reading with a full-day pool average.

Questions and answers

Is hashrate the same as electricity efficiency?

No. Efficiency also needs power consumption. Within one algorithm, divide measured watts by hashrate in a stated unit; lower watts per unit of hashrate uses less power for the same rate.

Apply this to your setup

Create a comparison row with algorithm, original unit, converted TH/s or GH/s, measurement source, and averaging window. Do not put unrelated algorithms in the same total. If a pool estimate and local reading disagree, align the intervals first; a unit conversion cannot reconcile different measurement periods.

Sources and next steps

Use the hardware comparison tool and learn to calculate efficiency.

How this guide was prepared: AI-generated drafting with the linked technical references and illustrative calculations. It does not report first-hand equipment tests or a named specialist review.

About the author

MiningFAQ Editorial Team

Mining researchers and editors focused on clear sourcing, explicit units, and practical operating constraints.

Our editorial standards →

Put your assumptions to work

Test energy costs, operating returns, and payback using your own inputs.

Explore the calculators